<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sproutblog - Startup news and opinions from SproutBox &#187; sand hill road</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sproutbox.com/tag/sand-hill-road/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sproutbox.com</link>
	<description>SproutBox Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t be a banker. (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://blog.sproutbox.com/2010/03/09/dont-be-a-banker-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sproutbox.com/2010/03/09/dont-be-a-banker-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sand hill road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seed stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sproutbox.com/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Tom Perkins claims that &#8220;Too often, there is confusion between investment banking and venture capital.&#8221; It&#8217;s hard to argue with that statement, but it&#8217;s investors like Tom Perkins that deserve the bulk of the blame for this confusion. Perkins says the difference between VC and Investment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704454304575081591449816712.html" target="_blank">recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal</a>, Tom Perkins claims that &#8220;Too often, there is confusion between investment banking and venture capital.&#8221; It&#8217;s hard to argue with that statement, but it&#8217;s investors like Tom Perkins that deserve the bulk of the blame for this confusion. Perkins says the difference between VC and Investment Banking (IB) is that &#8220;venture capitalists work with entrepreneurs to start new companies from the ground up&#8221;. I&#8217;m not sure how Perkins defines &#8220;the ground&#8221;, but I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;d need to take an elevator to get up there.</p>
<p>Perkins&#8217; firm <a href="http://www.kpcb.com" target="_blank">Kleiner Perkins Caufield &amp; Byers</a> has certainly done its fair share of early investing. They became famous for being early investors in homerun deals like Amazon and Google, but even in those cases, they weren&#8217;t in &#8216;from the ground&#8217;. <a href="http://www.google.com/corporate/timeline/#start">When they invested in Google</a>, for example, Google already had 11 employees. That may seem really early considering the number of employees Google has today, but it&#8217;s really late compared to Andy Bechtolsheim&#8217;s investment a year earlier. He wrote a $100,000 check before there were any employees and before the entity was even filed!. That&#8217;s ground level investing.</p>
<p>More importantly, KPCB (and most of the other Sand Hill Road crowd) get most of their exposure from the massive returns they generate when one of their portfolio companies IPO&#8217;s. The returns are phenomenal (KPCB&#8217;s Amazon investment produced about a 55,000% return), so I can&#8217;t blame them for focusing intently on these opportunities. But, please don&#8217;t whine about the confusion with IB when taking companies public is your MO. For more evidence of this attitude, look no further than <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/02/28/dont-pull-a-patzer-and-other-lessons-learned-on-our-trip-down-sand-hill-road/" target="_blank">Sand Hill Road&#8217;s disappointment</a> in the measly 5x return that Aaron Patzer produced for his mint.com investors.</p>
<p>The confusion is furthered by VC&#8217;s who openly offer &#8216;Founder Liquidity Stage Investments&#8221;. I&#8217;ve received calls this year from some of the most recognizable VC&#8217;s on both coasts telling me about these types of offerings, but apparently <a href="http://gigaom.com/2006/12/16/vcs-the-new-liquidity-providers/" target="_blank">it&#8217;s been happening for a while</a>. This is a really awesome thing for founders, because it allows them to realize a payday without dealing with the nightmare of taking a company public. But these VC &#8216;investments&#8217; are nothing more than a clever way to buy options in an imminent IPO. Gee, I wonder why that would cause confusion.</p>
<p>Every investor loves the &#8216;no-brainers&#8217; that produce certain returns, and every investor loves revenue and clear exit opportunities. Even traditional banks will finance many of these types of opportunities.  If some of us don&#8217;t step up and make pre-revenue investments based solely on our faith in the idea and the people involved, the bankers won&#8217;t have any &#8216;no-brainers&#8217; to consider. Unfortunately, this banker-mentality investing has infected more than just the big VC&#8217;s. In Part 2, I&#8217;ll talk about how some prominent angel investors are giddy about later-stage, fixed-return, low-risk, loans. Some of these guys should call themselves &#8216;Angel Loan Originators&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sproutbox.com/2010/03/09/dont-be-a-banker-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

